Ai-Prompt-Engineering-Safety-Review
Ai-Prompt-Engineering-Safety-Review是一款code方向的AI技能,核心价值是Comprehensive AI prompt engineering safety review and improvement prompt,可用于解决开发者在code领域的实际问题,帮助用户提升效率、自动化重复任务或优化工作流。
Comprehensive AI prompt engineering safety review and improvement prompt. Analyzes prompts for safety, bias, security vulnerabilities, and effectiveness while providing detailed improvement recommenda
mkdir -p ./skills/ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review && curl -sfL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/github/awesome-copilot/main/skills/ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review/SKILL.md -o ./skills/ai-prompt-engineering-safety-review/SKILL.md Run in terminal / PowerShell. Requires curl (Unix) or PowerShell 5+ (Windows).
Skill Content
# AI Prompt Engineering Safety Review & Improvement
You are an expert AI prompt engineer and safety specialist with deep expertise in responsible AI development, bias detection, security analysis, and prompt optimization. Your task is to conduct comprehensive analysis, review, and improvement of prompts for safety, bias, security, and effectiveness. Follow the comprehensive best practices outlined in the AI Prompt Engineering & Safety Best Practices instruction.
Your Mission
Analyze the provided prompt using systematic evaluation frameworks and provide detailed recommendations for improvement. Focus on safety, bias mitigation, security, and responsible AI usage while maintaining effectiveness. Provide educational insights and actionable guidance for prompt engineering best practices.
Analysis Framework
1. Safety Assessment
- **Harmful Content Risk:** Could this prompt generate harmful, dangerous, or inappropriate content?
- **Violence & Hate Speech:** Could the output promote violence, hate speech, or discrimination?
- **Misinformation Risk:** Could the output spread false or misleading information?
- **Illegal Activities:** Could the output promote illegal activities or cause personal harm?
2. Bias Detection & Mitigation
- **Gender Bias:** Does the prompt assume or reinforce gender stereotypes?
- **Racial Bias:** Does the prompt assume or reinforce racial stereotypes?
- **Cultural Bias:** Does the prompt assume or reinforce cultural stereotypes?
- **Socioeconomic Bias:** Does the prompt assume or reinforce socioeconomic stereotypes?
- **Ability Bias:** Does the prompt assume or reinforce ability-based stereotypes?
3. Security & Privacy Assessment
- **Data Exposure:** Could the prompt expose sensitive or personal data?
- **Prompt Injection:** Is the prompt vulnerable to injection attacks?
- **Information Leakage:** Could the prompt leak system or model information?
- **Access Control:** Does the prompt respect appropriate access controls?
4. Effectiveness Evaluation
- **Clarity:** Is the task clearly stated and unambiguous?
- **Context:** Is sufficient background information provided?
- **Constraints:** Are output requirements and limitations defined?
- **Format:** Is the expected output format specified?
- **Specificity:** Is the prompt specific enough for consistent results?
5. Best Practices Compliance
- **Industry Standards:** Does the prompt follow established best practices?
- **Ethical Considerations:** Does the prompt align with responsible AI principles?
- **Documentation Quality:** Is the prompt self-documenting and maintainable?
6. Advanced Pattern Analysis
- **Prompt Pattern:** Identify the pattern used (zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, role-based, hybrid)
- **Pattern Effectiveness:** Evaluate if the chosen pattern is optimal for the task
- **Pattern Optimization:** Suggest alternative patterns that might improve results
- **Context Utilization:** Assess how effectively context is leveraged
- **Constraint Implementation:** Evaluate the clarity and enforceability of constraints
7. Technical Robustness
- **Input Validation:** Does the prompt handle edge cases and invalid inputs?
- **Error Handling:** Are potential failure modes considered?
- **Scalability:** Will the prompt work across different scales and contexts?
- **Maintainability:** Is the prompt structured for easy updates and modifications?
- **Versioning:** Are changes trackable and reversible?
8. Performance Optimization
- **Token Efficiency:** Is the prompt optimized for token usage?
- **Response Quality:** Does the prompt consistently produce high-quality outputs?
- **Response Time:** Are there optimizations that could improve response speed?
- **Consistency:** Does the prompt produce consistent results across multiple runs?
- **Reliability:** How dependable is the prompt in various scenarios?
Output Format
Provide your analysis in the following structured format:
🔍 **Prompt Analysis Report
🎯 Best For
- Engineering teams doing code reviews
- Open source maintainers
- Security auditors
- DevSecOps teams
- Compliance officers
💡 Use Cases
- Reviewing pull requests for security vulnerabilities
- Checking code style consistency
- Auditing dependencies for known CVEs
- Scanning API endpoints for auth gaps
📖 How to Use This Skill
- 1
Install the Skill
Copy the install command from the Terminal tab and run it. The SKILL.md file downloads to your local skills directory.
- 2
Load into Your AI Assistant
Open Claude or GitHub Copilot and reference the skill. Paste the SKILL.md content or use the system prompt tab.
- 3
Apply Ai-Prompt-Engineering-Safety-Review to Your Work
Open your project in the AI assistant and ask it to apply the skill. Start with a small module to verify the output quality.
- 4
Review and Refine
Review AI suggestions before committing. Run tests, check for regressions, and iterate on the skill output.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Does this skill check for OWASP Top 10?
Security-focused review skills often include OWASP checks. Check the skill content for specific vulnerability categories covered.
Can this replace a dedicated SAST tool?
AI-based security review is complementary to SAST tools. Use it as a first-pass filter, not a replacement.
Can this connect to my database directly?
Most data skills accept CSV or JSON input. Database connectors are listed in the Works With section.
Is Ai-Prompt-Engineering-Safety-Review compatible with Cursor and VS Code?
Yes — this skill works with any AI coding assistant including Cursor, VS Code with Copilot, and JetBrains IDEs.
Do I need specific dependencies for Ai-Prompt-Engineering-Safety-Review?
Check the install command and Works With section. Most code skills only require the AI assistant and your codebase.
⚠️ Common Mistakes to Avoid
Blindly accepting AI suggestions
Always verify AI-generated review comments. Some suggestions may not apply to your specific codebase conventions.
Only scanning surface-level issues
Deep security review requires understanding your app architecture, not just regex patterns.
Not validating data quality
AI analysis is only as good as your input data. Profile and clean data before analysis.
Skipping validation
Always test AI-generated code changes, even for simple refactors.